|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Sept 7, 2010 8:33:29 GMT
I think Bird Rights should carry on from real life, here at DLite. If not for any other reason than I would instantly lose all my Big 3 ;D
Srsly though, I think a lot of teams will be in trouble if we don't implement this rule. What's everyone's thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jordan on Sept 7, 2010 11:05:52 GMT
I definitely think Bird rights should continue from real life.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mitch Kupchak on Sept 7, 2010 11:48:44 GMT
I think Bird Rights should carry on from real life, here at DLite. If not for any other reason than I would instantly lose all my Big 3 ;D Srsly though, I think a lot of teams will be in trouble if we don't implement this rule. What's everyone's thoughts? i was never a friend of the "3 year rule"...i think everybody read the Dirk-Story, whose franchisecareer sadly but truly cant continue in Atlanta only cuz of the weird rules. anyway i believe real life rules (trade bird rights with the players) are better, and iam saying that although all my important players have long contract  |
|
|
|
Post by Willis Reed on Sept 7, 2010 11:59:40 GMT
Carrying over Bird rights is a must I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oscar Robertson on Sept 7, 2010 14:30:03 GMT
Not much of a problem for me, as I hav Jennings and Bogut locked up. Still, I think Bird Rights should carry over from real life. It would make it easier on teams.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Sept 7, 2010 14:54:27 GMT
Cool, that's pretty much decided then.
|
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Sept 7, 2010 15:13:03 GMT
It sucks for me a little cause out of my big 5 (Parker, TD, Manu, Hill, Blair) Parker is the only one that doesn't have a contract longer then 2 years, but the Spurs are usually fiscally sound, so I should be able to bring TP back as long as I keep my team salary from 35-40 million and the salary cap is at 55-58 million.
|
|
Boston Celtics
Charlotte Bobcats [/color]
LA Lakers
New York Knicks [/color]
Milwaukee Bucks[/color]
San Antonio Spurs[/color]